[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pf/carp for redundant production use
On Sep 26, 2005, at 11:07 AM, Chad M Stewart wrote:
On Sep 25, 2005, at 9:39 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
On Sep 25, 2005, at 8:30 AM, Neil wrote:
Yep, the same behavior when the master dies. The solution that
the person in #pf told me is use routing but I don't know how to
implement. He told me that it's an issue in pf's NAT.
2) This is not tested, but I suspect that you should be able to
use the new interface grouping features in 3.8 to simply assign
multiple physical interfaces to the same group. Even if one
fails, the other *should* maintain the MASTER state and avoid any
partial failure consequences. I'd love to hear from other users
or developers that have tried the grouping feature in this sort of
Can you share where one might read more about the interface
grouping features of 3.8?
Sorry, I meant to refer to the new trunking features (man 4 trunk).