[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pf(4) schemantics

On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:47:44PM +0100, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:52:14PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:16:10PM +0100, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
> > > This is cosmetics. However, whouldn't we get some performance increase
> > > if pf(4) didn't bother looking at packets (in certain situations) going
> > > 'out' at all?
> > please show me where that tiny little state search is a problem in real world.
> We want pf(4) to outperform those nifty FWSM/5Gbps firewall blades. No?
chances are we do already?
why in hell do you think that THIS is the bottleneck, if at all?
where's your detailed performance analysis?