[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pf(4) schemantics



On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:13:04PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > I assume that 'pass out all keep state' makes pf(4), at least, do a
> > state lookup in the table? AFAIK, that's, in worst case scenario, 16
> > searches down the binary tree? That ought to eat a few cycles.
> I really doubt there is a performance issue here, or really, that this
> would be the bottleneck. If it is, show the facts, and we (I use the
> royal we here, meaning Daniel or Henning) can address it then.
Hmm? It might not be a major bottleneck, but keeping state for nothing
and on _two_ interfaces, must cost something. Let's not forget about
memory cost also.