[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


you are here! oh and the -current MAN page. the ALTQ man page should also
work - Xavier's referrals outline what hadn't made the blending, but that
isn't current ;) 
>>>>there was some talk of starting a WIKI on PF rulesets, that would be a
good place to look!<<<<<<
but I think that hasn't happened yet - there are good examples peppered
through this list - Daniel shares really well.
and the timing of PF+ALTQ is confirmed in Daniel's kerneltrap.org 10.2002
interview - blended too late for 3.2.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Chubb [mailto:dchubb@virpack.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:33 PM
To: pf@benzedrine.cx
Subject: RE: ALTQ
Updating to -current. We are using this for part of a testing environment to
simulate some adverse network conditions so it doesn't have to be entirely
Is there a good place to go find what correct syntax for all the different
ALTQ options? (And any gotcha's for the implementation under PF?)
-----Original Message-----
From: PF@0x1b.com [mailto:PF@0x1b.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:29 PM
To: dchubb@virpack.com; pf@benzedrine.cx
Subject: RE: ALTQ
looks like it made -current after the freeze on 3.2 - so get a 3.3 CD when
they ship.
didn't play with CVS so I could be wrong! but I don't think you could play
with ALTQ+PF in 3.2, only -current.
there are answers that shouldn't make you think...and lookup a purchase and
cross reference it with a posting - depending on the phase of the moon.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Chubb [mailto:dchubb@virpack.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:45 PM
To: pf@benzedrine.cx
Subject: ALTQ
Quick question: Is ALTQ implemented in the stable branch of 3.2? Or do I
have to update to -current?